Although theover 8 years ago, you may not recognize it as easily as other popular formats such as JPEG, PNG, or GIF. However, it is a format that has a lot of potentials – especially for website images.
In fact, there are several key benefits that you stand to gain if you do use the WebP format for your images:
Smaller file sizes for images
Overall, WebP offers one of the best compression options for images that are currently available and widely-supported. It can reduce most images’ file size by a significant margin, ranging from 30% upwards.
Seeing as websites use visual content more liberally nowadays, that file size reduction is definitely worthwhile. It is one of the main reasons why platforms such as Facebook, Google, and YouTube use the format extensively.
Faster page speed
The fact that WebP can compress images to significantly smaller file sizes will allow webpages to load faster. That, in turn, can improve both the user experience and SEO of websites.
Converting images to WebP is one of the more frequently-recommended steps on Google’s Page Speed Insights – which should tell you how important they consider it to be.
A better alternative for animated images
Although animated GIFs continue to be popular, WebP provides a far better alternative. Its animated images’ file sizes are significantly smaller (20% to 60%), and it supports 24-bit RGB color with an 8-bit alpha channel compared to the 8-bit color and 1-bit alpha of GIFs.
In short, you can create animated images that have far better quality while at the same time conserving both storage space and bandwidth and speeding up your websites too.
As you may have noted, WebP supports an– which essentially means that you can have opaque or even transparent elements in your images. That makes it a good alternative to GIF and PNG images with transparent backgrounds – such as logos or icons.
Once again, you can expect to reduce the file size of transparent images and serve them in better quality by migrating to WebP.
Considering all these benefits, you may be wondering what the catch is. To be honest, there is one: WebP is not supported by all browsers just yet. As such, you will have to use a fallback to cater to browsers that don’t support it, such as Safari and Internet Explorer.
That shouldn’t be an issue, really, and it can help to use Movavi Photo Editor. With it, you can learnand then save it in any format you choose. On top of that, its features will give you other ways to improve your image, remove unwanted elements, apply filters, add text, and more.
All said and done, even though you’ll need to use a fallback, the benefits of WebP are more than compelling. It will significantly improve your website on many fronts, and you should definitely try to utilize it if it is an option.